The description for Stubs is: “A Stub is a great Atlas Obscura place, but would benefit from additional information or photos. Please help our community by expanding these Stubs into great place entries.”
Considering this, I find it odd that edits for Stubs are rarely applied. Generally speaking, when sending Edit suggestions for regular Places, if these are accepted, they are deployed shortly after (minus the occasional lost one). On the other hand, edits for Stubs seem to never be accepted.
In all the following cases, I have sent the relevant suggestions, more than once in some cases:
Issues with main pictures:
Thumbnail cuts off the head of the statues:
Better options for main picture: https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/ernie-pyle-house-library
Issues with location:
In BrusselS: https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/cinema-nova
Should use the English name “Bruges”: https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/centrale-begraafplaats-brugge-assebroek
Should be spelled “Chisinau” as per destination guide:
For one, the island is called SardinIa in English, plus the use of an English cardinal direction is uncommon on the Atlas: https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/miniera-di-monte-narba
Based on Google Maps, and the text of the Place, this seems to be Tytoona rather than “Tyrion”: https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/tyrion-s-cave-nature-preserve-area
On this page there has been some feedback about the abundance of rather short Stubs being published lately. Personally, I only see a point in Stubs if they are a blueprint on which to build a more complete, correct Place. The purpose seems defeated if edit suggestions for them are just ignored.